Torley_windlight_pic

Fun comment from Joey1058, reflecting on the NFT art gold rush, which has led to some NFT art galleries in blockchain-based worlds like Cryptovoxels and Decentraland:

In terms of broader community, I'm starting to see virtual worlds aligning into classifications. Cryptovoxels and Decentraland are similar to the richer cosmopolises, like New York. Here is where you'll find arts and culture. Museums, theaters, gardens, zoos and other venues. All based on an NFT foundation. Places like IMVU, Sinespace, and Second Life are the equivalent of "working man's" towns. Still cultured, but with an everyday foundation in "getting your hands dirty and doing it yourself". AltspaceVR is a corporate lifeline. And VRChat is pure relaxed social freestyle.

I get where Joey's going with the New York analogy, though as I noted in the post, both Cryptovoxels and Decentraland have very small resident user populations and seem to be focused more on financial speculation, than the arts. Maybe a better comparison is Dubai? (Then again, New York is also heavy with speculators.)

Any suggestions for "working man's towns" to compare IMVU, Sinespace, and Second Life?

Well, I once called Second Life the Portland of metaverses:

Portland, Oregon is a lovely, livable, mid-sized city with an excellent public transportation system and high property values; surrounded by picturesque mountains, forests, and the nearby ocean, it has thriving immigrant and creative communities, and consequently, is a relatively important center for high-tech business start-ups. Culturally, it shares a lot in common with Second Life, and with a population of 537,000, their community sizes just about match, too: official demographer Meta Linden just released SL's latest user metrics, and not counting users in the cordoned teen grid, Second Life now has an active user base of 538,400, in-world an average time of 45 hours a month

I wrote that in 2007 and the usage rates for SL are roughly the same today.

No virtual world-to-real city analogy is perfect, but it's an enjoyable thought experiment to play. Post more analogies in Comments!

Posted in

4 responses to “If Virtual Worlds Like Decentraland and Second Life Were Cities, Which Would They Be? (Comment of the Week)”

  1. Nodoka Hanamura Avatar

    Well, I once called Second Life the Portland of metaverses:
    I’d say it’s more the Cincinnati of virtual worlds, only for the fact that whereas Cincinnati has a issue with potholes, we in Second Life have an issue with pothills.
    https://youtu.be/_RsM3fRoWQc?t=578
    Jokes and shilling my videos aside, SL is quite cultured, especially on Mainland, where the various cultures of residents around the world are sometimes shown on display, such as in the Hinamizawa area around Electra in Heterocera, or in Second Norway or the Malolo Islands.

    Like

  2. Han Held Avatar
    Han Held

    idk -the Interzone?

    Like

  3. irihapeti Avatar
    irihapeti

    from a town planning pov, Second Life is more like a RL developing nation
    if we were to narrow it down to a single town/city type then Shanty Town would be most apt I think. Shanty meaning that pretty much anything goes in terms of infrastructure planning and building codes

    Like

  4. Cajsa Avatar

    As a Portlander, I have to disagree. After all, in Portland have our Urban Growth Boundary that limits expansion outside the metaphorical mainland. We have height limits on buildings so people can see Mt. Hood. Only prim limits restrict our buildings on SL. I guess the City Council permitting Mother-In-Law housing (what a ridiculous name) could be parallel to the low-cost, low-prim homesteads, but SL features anarchic constructs. Portland features anarchic people, but our building is very conformist. Seriously, you have no idea how unpopular people who build a house in our neighborhoods that do not fit the bungalow, Victorian, and Portland Foursquare style. If you want a modern split-level or ranch, you will be more welcome in the suburbs.

    Like

Leave a comment